Jenny Tattersall, Tom Sapsford & David Drew
Swedenborg Hall, London
17 October 2001
Wednesday 17th October saw the AGM of the Ballet Association and an absolutely
riveting discussion led by David Drew, Jenny Tattersall and Tom Sapsford.
David had brought these two young members of the Royal Ballet to speak to
the Association because both are rather 'outspoken' and also involved in many
interesting things apart from appearing on the main stage with the Company.
It proved a wise choice, not only in that it avoided any discussion of the
new regime (which would have been premature), but also that it led to a meeting
different from any that many of us had ever attended, with deep discussion
over new works and the role of experimental choreography in the life of the
RB.
Both dancers were adamant that it was their involvement in new work that secured
them entry into the Royal Ballet; Sapsford with his choreography and Tattersall
with her friendship and collaboration with Cathy Marston.
Tom insisted that he didn't really understand 'ballet' until he went into
the company, but instead, he had always choreographed (he had always watched
Top of The Pops from a very young age and had set it all out in dance terms,
flinging himself around his living room), indeed, he stated that his best
work is still started in his front room! At the RBS he won the First Year
Upper School Choreographic Prize with a piece that de Valois insisted be repeated
and Macmillan gave him a prize two years running which was to attend other
events of other art forms (essential to be a good choreographer, he felt).
His creativity was such yet Merle Park, the then Director of the RBS, advised
him to brush up his dancing in order to get into the Company with the words
"Even Fred and Kenneth had to dance".
Jenny had tried for White Lodge and failed to get in, but managed later on
at the age of 13 and was subsequently taken into the company a year ahead
of time, thereby losing all her school friends, especially Cathy Marston,
who didn't manage to get into the company. She then spent the first two years
"not doing very much" but, interestingly, it was her contemporary
work which was recognised and singled her out.
From this point in the evening, the normal format of the meeting somewhat
broke down and became more a discussion between the speakers and the floor,
with many interesting opinions expressed. What emerged was that Drew feels
Sapsford to be very much a choreographer in the British tradition of Ashton/MacMillan/Cranko,
in that he works collaboratively with his dancers and often with those he
has known for a long time; just as Tattersall is somewhat Marston's muse.
This intimacy which comes about from a company which grows, in which the creators
and performers have worked and matured together is essential in Drew's opinion,
an intimacy unachievable when guests fly in and fly out or just stay for a
couple of seasons
Tattersall has been entrusted with a large project by Deborah Bull, in her
new capacity as Director of the Clore and Linbury auditoria. She is mounting
'Outside in Two', which will feature 5 outside choreographers working with
RB dancers and which includes 4 music commissions. The dates are the 18th,
19th, 20th and 22nd February 2002.
There was much discussion over the now defunct 'Dance Bites' which toured
outside London and afforded the opportunities for new choreography to be made
and seen. Drew felt that with Bull taking over the two small spaces from January,
there will be far more opportunity to see Dance bite style of work at Covent
Garden.
A long discussion ensued over the nature of the choreographic creations -
some felt that outside creators working at the Clore with RB dancers was marvellous,
but did little to nurture internal choreographers, RB creators. The ADI (Artists
Development Initiative) which has presented so much new work at the Clore
over the past two seasons is outside the aegis of the ROH/RB; dancers work
on new pieces in their own time and although the management is very tolerant
or even supportive of it, many at the meeting felt that it was still outside
the RB and should be made part of the work of the Company. Drew for one advocated
scheduling company time for such work.
There was also a lively discussion over modern/new work, with the vast majority
of members coming down firmly in favour "Petipa was new once" said
one member. "Is there no-one who wants to choreograph in the 'Royal'
style?" asked one other to which came the reply that Marston and Sapsford
are evolutions of the style and that Wheeldon creates very much in 'that'
vein. After all, Edward Watson would not have come to prominence and been
seen in some dramatic 'main-house' roles had it not been for his contemporary
work.
All in all, a wonderfully stimulating evening with three excellent speakers:
David Drew whose championing of new work carries on the legacy of Leslie Edwards
and Norman Morrice and two passionate, intelligent and articulate artists
and creators speaking about their art.
© The Ballet Association 2002
Transcribed by Gerald Dowler
PRINT THIS REPORT with Acrobat
Reader (42k)
return to top